Danny Chaplin [mailto:danny.chaplin@chaplinpr.com] wrote:

DC> I Googled and found your charming article on your Blog. So what exactly is your point? The old folks died, no one gave a fuck about them. No one cared and no one saved them. Why do you have to open your stupid cakehole and comment? <DC

My point is that we don't have enough solid information to draw the conclusions that you draw from Broussard's tearful and unquestioned TV outburst. See my update at http://blog.360.yahoo.com/knowinghumans?p=209, giving more evidence for my point.

DC> As for your rebuttals as to why the Iraq was is a bad idea, if you think illegalling occupying Iraq is such a good idea WHY AREN'T YOU OVER THERE YOURSELF DOING SOME OF THE FIGHTING you silly, hypocritical cowardly bugger. <DC

The fact that someone like you reached directly for the ChickenHawk argument confirms that I correctly ranked it as the lamest argument against the invasion: http://blog.360.yahoo.com/knowinghumans?p=201.

So thank you for brightening my morning by drawing attention to two ways in which statements in my blog have gathered increased empirical support.