From: Brian Holtz [brian@holtz.org]
Sent: Friday,
November 19, 2004 7:44 AM
To: 'Joe Haik'
Subject: RE:
ROFL
I prefer to believe the evidences of Christianity, you prefer the myth
side of the coin.
My document systematically rebuts the
evidence for Christianity. You have no evidence or argument that I believe in
any "myth".
I am a believer in Republican pov, like Hannity, O'reilly, Boortz,
Ingram, Savage, etc, which you prob like Maher, Colmes, SAT NIGHT LIVE GUY ON
AIR AMERICA, (forget his name always).
I despise leftists like Colmes and Franken.
Maher is funny, but as a typical liberal he doesn't understand economics.
Savage is a clown. O'Reilly is not bad but highly over-rated. Don't know Ingram,
but Boortz (a libertarian) is way better than anybody on your
list.
I'm a longtime admirer of William F.
Buckley, Newt Gingrich, Thomas Sowell, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas. So
in assuming you know my politics, you're wrong yet again. Don't you ever get
tired of me proving you wrong?
So what I'm getting at is we will never ever agree.
What will "never" happen is that you will
never successfully come up with an excuse (like differences in political
opinion) to rationalize your inability to answer my arguments and
evidence.
And if you look at the Republican argument and gripes against Dems' the
Dem's don't see it that way and vice versa, no matter the proof. So I compare
that to you and I.
I hear this cop-out all the time in my
correspondence with Christians frustrated by their inability to answer my
arguments: "I'm still a Christian at the moment, and so are a lot of people, so
the arguments of each side must be roughly equal in their strength."
LOL.
you and I can argue for and till the end of time, and I guarentee
we won't agree.
I agree that you apparently are immune to
evidence and argument. Congratulations.
PS. In case you are wondering about me citing facts, I highlight all
facts in the books I read, but books are at home. So, I can say not true to
something and give you the basic facts, but specific are at home.
Then please stop bothering me until you have
access to some facts. Any facts.
I was surprised that so many issues of your webcite actually have been
addressed in books.
You mean "addressed" like when you
said all twelve apostles died for their belief in Jesus' divinity, and I
destroyed your argument by pointing out that your texts document only two
martyred resurrection witnesses, and that we have no evidence that recanting
their specific belief in the resurrection would have saved them? Yes, I too am
surprised at how often such weak counter-arguments get brought up, even though
they've long since been shredded in the atheist literature.
By the way, I'm still waiting for
you to declare what your name is. What kind of "witness" for Jesus argues in
anonymity?