From: Brian Holtz [brian@holtz.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 6:49 PM
To: 'Francois Tremblay'
Subject: RE: Evidence for Jesus ?

> Why should I ingratiate [sic] your desire in order
> for you to give an answer ? 

I already explained why: I debate why the consensus would be wrong on this one topic and not others. If you can't explain this alleged anomaly, then I assume that what's anomalous is your assessment of the consensus and not the consensus itself.

> I did find something I disagree with in Britannica

That's a quibble over semantics, not a disagreement with a basic conclusion derived from a body of empirical evidence.