From: Brian Holtz [brian@holtz.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 8:21 PM
To: 'Francois Tremblay'
Subject: RE: Evidence for Jesus ?

> So, you confirm that the only empirical evidence
> you have are a number of non-contemporary,
> non-credible and contradictory sources? Concession 
> accepted.

I in fact did not characterize for you the evidence that supports the overwhelming scholarly consensus for the historicity of Jesus. I merely pointed you at a bibliography that can describe that evidence for you.

> What empirical evidence?

See the scholarly literature I mentioned above.

I note that, other than typing the word "myth", you've yet to answer my question about why the consensus would be wrong on this one topic and not others. It appears that you're not interested in answering my question, and (as I said at the beginning) I'm not interested in answering yours.