From: Brian Holtz [brian@holtz.org]
Sent: Thursday,
January 16, 2003 10:06 AM
To: G. Zeineldé Jordan
Cc: Steve
Locks; Ed Babinski; Richard Carrier
Subject: Holtz-Jordan debate
You write at http://www.theism.net/authors/zjordan/debates_files/holtz.htm:
Okay, we agree on an
operational definition of scholarly authority. We further agree that Christ
existed, was crucified and became quite dead. What do you consider came of His
body?
I note that you do not dispute my correction
of your characterization of the baseline scholarly consensus. Does your
"definition of scholarly authority" include a provision that you don't have to
defend your mischaracterizations of the baseline consensus produced by that
"scholarly authority"?
brian@holtz.org
http://humanknowledge.net