From: Brian Holtz [brian@holtz.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 10:38 PM
To: 'brian@holtz.org'
Subject: Individualist Revolution
Where did you grow up?
Where did you go to school?
What is your current occupation?
How long have you been interested in Politics?
How did you become a Libertarian?
What made you run for the US Reprentative postion?
Whew! Luckily, I've already written down answers to these questions at http://marketliberal.org/Bio.html
What was your families belief about religion?
At what point did you become an Aethist?

See http://humanknowledge.net/Philosophy/Metaphysics/Theology/MyConversion.htm

How much does religion influence politics?
 
A lot less than it did a half century ago, and a lot more than it will in the future. Despite the alleged influence of faith in this election, I think religion in American politics today is more of a proxy for a traditionalist value system than it is a set of literal beliefs about supernatural beings and their interest in us. For my long-term predictions in this area, see
http://humanknowledge.net/Thoughts.html#LossOfFaith
http://humanknowledge.net/Thoughts.html#PoliticalDevelopments

What do you think about seperation of church and state?
 
It's a bedrock principle of the American polity, and I don't think it's nearly as threatened as a lot of my fellow secularists assume. Half a century ago and earlier, American politicians would refer to America as a Christian nation. Now they just invoke a monotheistic Abrahamic God, and are far more likely to talk about "spirituality" than about "Christianity".

How do you think people will be able to resolve their diffrences over believing in god or not?
 
In the political sphere, I think they pretty much already have: believers and non-believers alike usually no longer object to the other as having a politically inadmissible value system. In the cultural sphere, I think belief in revelation about supernatural beings has been diluted and hollowed out, and the more interesting difference is now between naturalists and mystics.

What are your feelings about Pro-Life?
 
I disagree with the "pro-life" position, not because I'm "pro-choice", but because I'm anti fetal personhood.  Being "pro-choice" on abortion is as coherent as being "pro-choice" on slave-owning. The position actually being advocated is the non-personhood of fetuses and slaves, respectively. But "No personhood for fetuses" is not a very fun bumper sticker, and so opponents of fetal personhood choose to obscure the real issue.

What do you think about the war on Iraq?
 
See http://marketliberal.org/Platform.html#8.6._Southwest_Asia_

How would a libetarian handle that conflict?
 
I believe that a small-L libertarian should agree with my position described above. A Big-L Libertarian (i.e. a party member) would typically oppose almost any foreign intervention, because they value their own hands being clean over other humans being free.

Do you think the current partisan based electoral system needs to be redesigned?
 
Despite all the problems with America's government, the U.S. Constitution has nevertheless created the single institution that in all human history has done by far the most good for humanity. I would be very cautious about tinkering with it, but I do like the idea of instant run-off voting.