Subject: Re: A more proper analogy
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 13:56:51 -0700
From: Brian Holtz <holtz@eng.sun.com>
Organization: Sun Microsystems
Newsgroups: alt.atheism.moderated

Netcom jimhumph wrote:

> Incidentally' faith ' does not mean unevidenced belief:

Surely for our purposes it does not simply mean belief without certitude,
or belief that is especially strong. Would you agree to define 'faith' as
belief based on revelation and exempt from doubt?  Do you have any such
beliefs (i.e. that are based on revelation and exempt from doubt)?

--
Brian Holtz        H:650-OK-HOLTZ   http://holtz.org
brian@holtz.org    W:650-SUN-0598   http://holtz.org/Brian.vcf
                   C:650-TOP-HOLT   callto:brian@holtz.org