your work is incredible inaccurate. Much of what you say will happen
over the next 50 years especially related to the Design of the universe
is totally inaccurate.

Your criticism is incredibly vague. If you have an argument that some prediction of mine is "inaccurate", feel free to state it.

You obviously do not keep up with the academic
research in the area of evolution and creation. Read Lee storbels book,
"a case for the creator" among many others that detail the collapse of
Darwinism in this country alone.

You follow "academic research" by reading a creationist lacking scientific credentials? Interesting.

It's true that I don't bother keeping up with "academic research" related to creationism, just as I don't keep up with "academic research" regarding the flatness of the Earth. When a thesis like evolution is endorsed by the overwhelming consensus of the mainstream peer-reviewed literature, the contrary thesis just isn't worth my time.  Folks with different priorities do an excellent job of annihilating creationism, e.g. at http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/outline.html.

Email me when you "see" the light
rather then walking in the darkness.

Email me when you can muster a coherent argument against anything I've written, instead of just invoking trite metaphors.

You area perfect congress candidate for the liberal, weak, ill intelligent state of california

"Ill intelligent"?  How funny.  Sorry, but California is the future, and your great-grandchildren will be atheists.

with a governor who has difficulty pronouncing many first grade words in the english language.

I don't know which is more bizarre: a) that you're bigoted enough to insult the accent of a bilingual immigrant (how's your German?), b) that you think doing so might somehow make me feel bad about myself, or c) that you fail to capitalize 'English' while trying to insult someone's English skills.