super-intelligence
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
super-intelligence [2024/10/10 21:06] – brian | super-intelligence [2025/02/15 15:22] (current) – brian | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ===== Capabilities ===== | + | ====== Capabilities |
Let's analyze the essential and expected capabilities of any general intelligence, | Let's analyze the essential and expected capabilities of any general intelligence, | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* how a superintelligence would exceed the capabilities of human intelligence. | * how a superintelligence would exceed the capabilities of human intelligence. | ||
- | ==== Core Competencies ==== | + | ===== Core Competencies |
Capacities are the capabilities that are most essential to intelligence. They are innate in humans, and don't need to be taught. We can't really imagine an intelligence lacking any of them. A mind significantly lacking any of them would seem severely handicapped, | Capacities are the capabilities that are most essential to intelligence. They are innate in humans, and don't need to be taught. We can't really imagine an intelligence lacking any of them. A mind significantly lacking any of them would seem severely handicapped, | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* **Language: | * **Language: | ||
- | ==== Bonus Competencies ==== | + | ===== Bonus Competencies |
These are further capabilities we expect that intelligent systems will possess or can acquire. They happen not to be innate in humans but are acquired by many humans. They are so useful that it would be shocking for an advanced general intelligence not to have them. | These are further capabilities we expect that intelligent systems will possess or can acquire. They happen not to be innate in humans but are acquired by many humans. They are so useful that it would be shocking for an advanced general intelligence not to have them. | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
For optimal decision-making, | For optimal decision-making, | ||
- | ==== Cognitive Virtues/ | + | ===== Cognitive Virtues/ |
Virtues/ | Virtues/ | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
* **Sensitivity: | * **Sensitivity: | ||
- | ==== Bonus Powers ==== | + | ===== Bonus Powers |
Powers are capabilities that seem somewhat independent of the ones above, that are often not well-developed in humans, and are general-purpose rather than domain-specific. | Powers are capabilities that seem somewhat independent of the ones above, that are often not well-developed in humans, and are general-purpose rather than domain-specific. | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
* **Mind Improvement: | * **Mind Improvement: | ||
- | ===== Artificial Super-Intelligence ===== | + | ====== Artificial Super-Intelligence |
- | ==== Bostrom Superpowers ==== | + | ===== Bostrom Superpowers |
Three of the superpowers are hand-waving: | Three of the superpowers are hand-waving: | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
* **Hacking: | * **Hacking: | ||
- | ==== Upgrades ==== | + | ===== Upgrades |
Dimensions of improvement available to AGI that are not available to humans: | Dimensions of improvement available to AGI that are not available to humans: | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
* Quantum computing | * Quantum computing | ||
- | ===== Notes ===== | + | ===== Anthropomorphizing AI ===== |
+ | |||
+ | * LLMs have a relatively self-consistent and monolithic system of values and goals | ||
+ | * | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Notes ====== | ||
* A hint that individual intelligence has diminishing returns is that our advances come far more from minds cooperating than from individual brilliance. Human organizations and societies are far more capable than the most brilliant humans, and yet organizations do not recognizably possess the standard capabilities of intelligence. | * A hint that individual intelligence has diminishing returns is that our advances come far more from minds cooperating than from individual brilliance. Human organizations and societies are far more capable than the most brilliant humans, and yet organizations do not recognizably possess the standard capabilities of intelligence. | ||
* The " | * The " | ||
Line 123: | Line 128: | ||
* 2002 Yudkowsky: | * 2002 Yudkowsky: | ||
* " | * " | ||
- | * Challenges | + | |
+ | | ||
* Understand cetacean language (unless it's trivial like meerkat language) | * Understand cetacean language (unless it's trivial like meerkat language) | ||
* For a >10Kloc >5yo production system, without human supervision or intervention: | * For a >10Kloc >5yo production system, without human supervision or intervention: | ||
Line 131: | Line 137: | ||
* Resolve all the TODO comments | * Resolve all the TODO comments | ||
* Refactor all significant code duplication | * Refactor all significant code duplication | ||
+ | |||
+ | It's similarly invalid to analogize the gap between super-intelligence and human intelligence to the gap between humans and some dumber species, be it chimp or ant or bacterium. Such naive analogies assume intelligence is an open-ended scalar capacity, like speed or strength or longevity. The analogy leans heavily on the (dumb?) notion that a dumber entity can't fathom the notion of a | ||
+ | |||
+ | since an ant or chimp can't fathom having human-level intelligence, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | One might as well just invoke " | ||
+ | |||
+ | Saturation: toxicity, visual acuity, height, camouflage, healing, invulnerability | ||
+ | |||
+ | Saturation: algorithmic, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Such analogies assume intelligence is an open-ended scalar, like | ||
+ | |||
+ | altitude, latitude, temperature | ||
+ | |||
+ | mass, power, body temperature, | ||
+ | |||
+ | self-awareness, | ||
+ | |||
+ | integers, reals, aleph | ||
+ | |||
+ | super-ness | ||
+ | |||
+ | But assumptions are no more privileged than an analogy to a quantity that has a maximum built into its definition -- such as latitude or humidity or albedo. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | A better analogy would be to scales with definitions that are more subtle, while still being objectively defined, such as hardness, loudness, or sharpness. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Critique claim that human intelligence would be much higher without skull birth canal limit. | ||
super-intelligence.1728615983.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/10/10 21:06 by brian