User Tools

Site Tools


super-intelligence

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
super-intelligence [2024/10/13 23:07] briansuper-intelligence [2025/02/15 15:22] (current) brian
Line 77: Line 77:
   * Modifiability by self or others   * Modifiability by self or others
   * Quantum computing   * Quantum computing
 +
 +===== Anthropomorphizing AI =====
 +
 +* LLMs have a relatively self-consistent and monolithic system of values and goals
 +
  
 ====== Notes ====== ====== Notes ======
Line 123: Line 128:
   * 2002 Yudkowsky:   * 2002 Yudkowsky:
     * "primate evolution stumbled across a fitness gradient whose path includes [..] one particular kind of general intelligence"     * "primate evolution stumbled across a fitness gradient whose path includes [..] one particular kind of general intelligence"
-  * Challenges+  * skull birth canal limit 
 +  * Challenges/Predictions
     * Understand cetacean language (unless it's trivial like meerkat language)     * Understand cetacean language (unless it's trivial like meerkat language)
     * For a >10Kloc >5yo production system, without human supervision or intervention:     * For a >10Kloc >5yo production system, without human supervision or intervention:
Line 131: Line 137:
       * Resolve all the TODO comments       * Resolve all the TODO comments
       * Refactor all significant code duplication       * Refactor all significant code duplication
-    * Number of hours doing economically useful work without human intervention +  
-    * Able to do one of the BLS occupations +It's similarly invalid to analogize the gap between super-intelligence and human intelligence to the gap between humans and some dumber species, be it chimp or ant or bacterium. Such naive analogies assume intelligence is an open-ended scalar capacity, like speed or strength or longevity. The analogy leans heavily on the (dumb?) notion that a dumber entity can't fathom the notion of a  
-    * Able to obsolte one of the BLS occupations+ 
 +since an ant or chimp can't fathom having human-level intelligence, therefore humans must not be able to fathom having super-human intelligence. 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +One might as well just invoke "super-ness" 
 + 
 +Saturation: toxicity, visual acuity, height, camouflage, healing, invulnerability 
 + 
 +Saturation: algorithmic, computational, domain (tic tac toe), information-theoretic 
 + 
 +Such analogies assume intelligence is an open-ended scalar, like  
 + 
 +altitude, latitude, temperature 
 + 
 +mass, power, body temperature, speed, toxicity, visual acuity, smell acuity 
 + 
 +self-awareness, inerrancy, consciousness, volition, self-consistency, shrewdness, reasonableness, wit, creativity 
 + 
 +integers, reals, aleph 
 + 
 +super-ness 
 + 
 +But assumptions are no more privileged than an analogy to a quantity that has a maximum built into its definition -- such as latitude or humidity or albedo. 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +A better analogy would be to scales with definitions that are more subtle, while still being objectively defined, such as hardness, loudness, or sharpness.  
 + 
 +Critique claim that human intelligence would be much higher without skull birth canal limit.
  
super-intelligence.1728882426.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/10/13 23:07 by brian

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki