From: Brian Holtz [brian@holtz.org]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 6:21 PM
To: 'Joe Haik'
Subject: RE: ROFL
As, usual you are lying. You told me that you believe that Christianity is a myth, now you are lying.
I said Christianity "offers myths",  I identified the Resurrection as one such myth, and when you said that I call Christianity a "lie", I corrected you by saying "It's not a lie, it's a myth" in order to contrast its mythical elements with its allegedly deceptive elements.
 
But I obviously don't believe that the Jesus' entire existence is a myth and I told you that I don't believe in a long list of anti-Christian conspiracy theories about the Bible. One such conspiracy theory is that Jesus never lived and is purely mythical. This thesis is called the "Christ-myth", and this is what I was thinking of when I wrote eight days later that Christianity "is not a myth". 
 
It's simply not true that I have ever made an intentionally false statement to you. Deceiving you would take all the fun out of proving you're wrong, and then I'd have to be careful to not re-use my lies to you against someone better-equipped to fact-check them.
 
My position on Christianity is made crystal-clear by my document refuting it. It's just ludicrous to suggest I would ever lie about what I had said to you in a previous email, when it's so easy to do a text search and find out what I actually said.  But keep sputtering about "lying" if that's what you need to do to convince yourself that the prima facie power of my arguments must somehow involve deception.
I'm sure your son who passed on would love to see you again,
http://humanknowledge.net/Philosophy/Metaphysics/Theology/TheistQuestions.htm#Heaven
but that isn't prob going to happen
http://humanknowledge.net/Philosophy/Metaphysics/Theology/GospelProbabilities.html
since as you put it, your superior morally to God.
I'm morally superior to the deity described in the sacred scrolls your mommy and daddy taught you to believe in. But that's no big accomplishment, since as I pointed out, even Satan is morally superior to Yahweh as the two are described in your scrolls. (I notice you have no answer to the facts about Satan that I cited from your scrolls.)
So, looks like in forty years, or when the Rapture happens,
http://humanknowledge.net/Philosophy/Metaphysics/Theology/TheistQuestions.htm#Hope
 your going to be roasting on a spit.
http://humanknowledge.net/Philosophy/Metaphysics/Theology/TheistQuestions.htm#Justness
could you tell me where Jesus body is? 
No. Can you tell me the location of the body of Jesus' mentor John the Baptist? Or his mother Mary? Or his brother James?
  I await another theory.
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/resurrection/3.html#vi
http://www.secweb.org/asset.asp?AssetID=125
try to present facts, like, nobody could have stolen Christ's body since the stone was guarded
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/resurrection/2.html#viii
 and too heavy. Sorry again to present that fact.
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/resurrection/2.html#vi
Does your wife know you need mental help? Or is she a mongoloid lib like you? Please, raise your kids right, so they don't become mindless Christian haters with the 'no morality values' of libs.
It's hiilarious to hear you warn against mindlessness and hate. You and other Christians can hate me all you want, but I merely pity you. I have rock-solid morality and values (http://humanknowledge.net/Thoughts.html#WhatToDo), and they are clearly superior to yours: http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/raymond_bradley/moral.html.
 
To test your alleged values, I dare you to answer this question: http://humanknowledge.net/Philosophy/Metaphysics/Theology/WhatIfGodQuit.html
Sorry that Bush won.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/marketliberal/message/481
If you could destroy Christianity with your hehe facts, there wouldn't be so many of us around and so many books published.
I never said I could "destroy Christianity".
Also, I checked out one of your authors and went to his amazon reviews. Ok reviews, but it was funny how upon further research, he was to debate an apologetics professor at a university and he didn't show..Rofl. Typical, lib bomb throwing and running. Sorry hit you with that, fact.
So when challenged with the arguments in Martin's published book, you seek refuge in an unverified allegation posted by a partisan reviewer on the Internet. You also told me you "could paste a webcite that talks about how to make a penis grow by twice it's size". It's so nice how you're able to use the Internet to find solutions for so many of your personal challenges.
if Jesus didn't perform miracles, how come nobody in his time refuted these.
They did. The gospels record that many eyewitnesses of Jesus' alleged miracles were so unimpressed as to not believe in him: Mary, Jesus' brothers and sisters, "many" disciples [Jn 6:66] and entire towns [Mt 11:20, Lk 10:13]. See also http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/kooks.html
They said he was using sorcery when they saw his miracles.
False. You cannot name a single witness who "saw his miracles" and called them sorcery. Also, aside from the people mentioned in your own gospels above, none of the sources we have about "sorcery" are from Jesus' time:
The only exception is Josephus, about whom see http://humanknowledge.net/Philosophy/Metaphysics/Theology/Christianity.html#Josephus 
I know, I know. The gospels lied.
No, I already told you it's more likely that the gospel authors were duped: http://humanknowledge.net/Philosophy/Metaphysics/Theology/GospelProbabilities.html